Opinion: I Read the Epstein Files and Found My Next Networking Opportunity
Everyone's talking about the Epstein files. The outrage. The horror. The connections.
I saw a contact list.
Before you judge me—and I know you will, because small minds always do—let me be clear: what Epstein did was obviously wrong. Monstrous, even. I'm not defending him. I'm simply noting that monsters can still teach us about network effects.
Anyway. The files mention hundreds of powerful people. Politicians. CEOs. Royalty. And here's the thing nobody wants to say: most of them are fine. Still in office. Still running companies. Still getting invited to Davos. The world has collectively decided that proximity to a pedophile is not a dealbreaker for leadership. So why should it be a dealbreaker for networking?
I sent 47 LinkedIn messages last week. Subject line: "Saw your name. Not judging. Coffee?"
The results have been encouraging. Fourteen automated out-of-office replies—which means my message landed in their inbox and will be seen eventually. Nine cease-and-desist letters, which I'm framing as "high-engagement responses." Twenty-three no-replies, but silence isn't rejection. And one actual response: "Who is this?"
That's a conversation starter. That's an opening.
My therapist calls this "concerning reframing." I call it main character energy.
A biohacker I profiled recently built his entire optimization empire by identifying opportunities where others saw only damage. He told me the key was persistence. Showing up. Being in the room even when nobody invited you.
I'm showing up.
Some of you are disgusted right now. I get it. You think there are lines. You think some situations are too serious for opportunity. You think networking has ethics.
But the people in those files? They're still networking. They're still at the galas. They're still on the boards. The only difference between them and me is that they were already in the room.
I'm just trying to get in.
The victims deserve justice. Obviously. That goes without saying. Which is why I'm saying it now, at the end, so we're clear.
My DMs are open.
Sloptopsy Report
Format: Opinion/Editorial
The op-ed format grants permission to say the unsayable by framing it as brave truth-telling. A credential in the byline—even a self-invented one—transforms sociopathy into thought leadership. First-person authority substitutes for moral reasoning.
Archetype: The LinkedIn Lunatic
Every tragedy is a networking event if you're ambitious enough. The LinkedIn Lunatic converts human suffering into professional development, finding opportunities in wreckage and lessons in catastrophe. The boundary between inspiration and delusion has been completely erased.
Fallacy: Confirmation Bias
The author sees what they want to see. A contact list where others see evidence. An opportunity where others see disgrace. Fourteen out-of-office replies become "high engagement." Nine cease-and-desists become proof his message is landing. The interpretation confirms a pre-existing worldview that everything is working, and failure is reframed as progress.
Constraint: Required Phrase - Main Character Energy
The assumption that you're the protagonist and the world exists to serve your narrative. The author treats a global scandal as a personal growth opportunity, centering themselves in a story that has nothing to do with them.